|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/3/2008 Posts: 259 Points: 1,204 Location: UK
|
I looked up Oestrogel. It's HRT (unopposed oestrogen form), applied topically, resulting in systemic absorption. Amongst many other things, it can aggravate a history of, or risk factors for, thromboembolic disorders or hypertension. Again, amongst many other things, it increases the risk of ischaemic stroke
I don't see how this is better than just taking HRT? If you can't take HRT for medical reasons, it doesn't look like you can take this.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/12/2008 Posts: 1,232 Points: 3,671
|
kosmeds wrote:
Sorry, I misunderstood. I posted on phytoestrogens.
Estradiol is probably the safest estrogen to use as a topical. It's been used to fill out acne scars. One brand name is Estrasorb. In Europe, brand name Oestrogel is available. But this is the sort of thing that a pharmacist can compound for you with rx from your doctor. If you don't like greasy creams, you can get one made in an alcohol/glycol-based gel or liquid. G1-17-betaestradiol 0.01% is one concentration that has been shown to result in significant increases in skin thickness, dermal papillae, and fibroblasts.
Hey Kosmed - Thanks for the info - I have never heard of it being used for acne scne scars - that would be wonderful - do you have a paper on it? Hotels in Cleveland
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/8/2009 Posts: 926 Points: 3,784
|
I looked up Oestrogel. It's HRT (unopposed oestrogen form), applied topically, resulting in systemic absorption. Amongst many other things, it can aggravate a history of, or risk factors for, thromboembolic disorders or hypertension. Again, amongst many other things, it increases the risk of ischaemic stroke
I don't see how this is better than just taking HRT? If you can't take HRT for medical reasons, it doesn't look like you can take this.
The warnings are the same as for HRT in general without regard to the dose.
But you can use a topical gel for your skin to deliver a much lower dose to the plasma than those typically used to restore plasma levels to premenopausal conditions. In this case, adverse event risks would be much lower.
I have never heard of it being used for acne scne scars - that would be wonderful - do you have a paper on it?
I had it ten years ago. But that was another hard drive. I can't get it electronically anymore, the online database is free only to 1997.
She (Schmidt) used iontophoresis to deliver a very high dose to the dermis. She also did it with tretinoin. It caused a stir in the acne scar community. We all had such high hopes. But very few practitioners were interested in buying a machine and all the sessions required (2x/week for 3 months)-lots of labor. I called some people who had a machine but nobody wanted to use it with estrogens or tretinoin.
I suspect you might perhaps get similar results with a dermaroller. But it could be risky. Good luck if you can find a doctor who is willing to help you, monitor you, etc. I tried! But nobody wanted to do it with/for me.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/29/2009 Posts: 2,493 Points: 7,736 Location: The leaf I am sitting on
|
Wow! A lot of interesting ideas, research and suggestions on this thread! First off: MissJ, if you've quit smoking, surely you could be a candidate for HRT? If you still smoke - you simply must administer 20 tight SLAPS to your hand if it reaches for a cig, and then vow to quit! Must. I also smoked off and on for many years - even tho it didn't agree with me. And I was a product of the 2nd-hand smoking family for as long as I lived at home growing up. So I definitely had 2 strikes against me. But I have been smoke-free since my mid-20s, and there is no history of stroke, heart attack or breast cancer in my family. Therefore, it was a no-brainer for me to segue from low-estrogen BCPs that I took from age 38-49 to HRT that I've been taking ever since. I did the 4-month LOONY trial at age 51, when I took myself off all forms of estrogen. Just didn't work for me. If I wanted to be miserable, achy, anxious, gain weight at the rate of a pound a month, see my skin crinkle up by the minute, I'd have stayed off HRT. But dammit, quality of life IS important - maybe even physically in addition to mentally. So I'm going to continue to live a healthy life and stay on my HRT. Also: I totally agree with the idea of getting a "baseline" hormone check in one's early 30s. It can be as simple as the FSH level. Monitor that, and as the FSH goes UP!, you know you're estrogen is going DOWN. It could help some women get into the right kind of medication at the right time in life, and not stumble into solutions at desperation time - as I suspect, many of us do! ======================================================================= MissJ wrote:Crap. My doctor WILL NOT give me estrogen or hormone therapy. (History of smoking--hate to admit but true.) I Bug U
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/3/2008 Posts: 259 Points: 1,204 Location: UK
|
Bugjune wrote:Therefore, it was a no-brainer for me to segue from low-estrogen BCPs that I took from age 38-49 to HRT that I've been taking ever since. I did the 4-month LOONY trial at age 51, when I took myself off all forms of estrogen. Just didn't work for me. If I wanted to be miserable, achy, anxious, gain weight at the rate of a pound a month, see my skin crinkle up by the minute, I'd have stayed off HRT. But dammit, quality of life IS important - maybe even physically in addition to mentally. So I'm going to continue to live a healthy life and stay on my HRT. Bugjune - what made you segue at age 49 from the pill to HRT? How would you know (if you were then), that you were having a menopause? How did you find the menopause on hormones - or was it cancelled effectively, as I'd like mine to be? And do you find the HRT to be "as good" as the Pill? in the sense that you felt the same? Sukinew felt there was nothing like the Pill. You've done just what I want to do - bar having the loony 4 month trial.
|
|
Rank: Administration Groups: Administration
Joined: 5/14/2008 Posts: 17,671 Points: 45,098
|
I've cut down some but I do it when sitting at computer. Weird, if I'm out in nature I don't even crave one but I do when writing. BANE of writers--that and scotch which luckily, I don't imbibe. I've been going way DOWN HILL since menopause but as I said, my doc does not want to give me any of the hormone stuff and that's something I don't know much about myself. I take some soy powder (phyto estrogen) and some herbal pill called; "meno ease" but that's not the real stuff. Bugjune wrote:Wow! A lot of interesting ideas, research and suggestions on this thread!
First off: MissJ, if you've quit smoking, surely you could be a candidate for HRT? If you still smoke - you simply must administer 20 tight SLAPS to your hand if it reaches for a cig, and then vow to quit! Must.
I also smoked off and on for many years - even tho it didn't agree with me. And I was a product of the 2nd-hand smoking family for as long as I lived at home growing up. So I definitely had 2 strikes against me.
But I have been smoke-free since my mid-20s, and there is no history of stroke, heart attack or breast cancer in my family. Therefore, it was a no-brainer for me to segue from low-estrogen BCPs that I took from age 38-49 to HRT that I've been taking ever since. I did the 4-month LOONY trial at age 51, when I took myself off all forms of estrogen. Just didn't work for me. If I wanted to be miserable, achy, anxious, gain weight at the rate of a pound a month, see my skin crinkle up by the minute, I'd have stayed off HRT. But dammit, quality of life IS important - maybe even physically in addition to mentally. So I'm going to continue to live a healthy life and stay on my HRT.
Also: I totally agree with the idea of getting a "baseline" hormone check in one's early 30s. It can be as simple as the FSH level. Monitor that, and as the FSH goes UP!, you know you're estrogen is going DOWN. It could help some women get into the right kind of medication at the right time in life, and not stumble into solutions at desperation time - as I suspect, many of us do!
=======================================================================
Can hardly walk. Need hip replacement.
|
|
Rank: Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/7/2009 Posts: 279 Points: 837 Location: MA
|
Having a bad day, a bad week - OK a bad year actually so pardon my posting and venting here. I turned 49 last week and lately all I do is obsess about how much older I look. Still dealing with PTSD type symptoms where I keep having flashbacks to me sitting on the beach in my early 40's like a damn idiot. I still looked good, young, healthy. I knew nothing, nothing, nothing back then. The constant ache of knowing that so much of this could have been avoided.
Went to the medical derm a few weeks ago and she gave me a prescription for hydroquinone to apply to dark spots, and she suggested an IPL consultation (!!!) with their nurse practitioner. She also gave me Refissa samples, which I had never heard of. After my appointment was over and I was getting dressed, an assistant came in, a very pale Irish woman who appeared to be in her late 50's, early 60's and told me she had had IPL with good results. I told the MD that I had heard many horror stories about IPL and she said that burns were the biggest risk but in the hands of an experienced practitioner, there should be no problem. I told her about the fat loss stories I'd heard and she said she had never heard of this (!!!). I would NEVER have IPL on my face but I hate the sun damage and major freckling/hyperpigmentation all over my upper back (and chest, but IPL seems risky there as well) from swimming outdoors for my whole life. Am considering JUST a consult in the late fall....
But as I survey my body, I feel like I might as well just throw in the towel. This sun damage is here to stay, it's ALL over - legs, arms, back, neck, chest, hands...face. Wrinkled, yellow, freckles, flat brown spots - everywhere. It's not as bad as some people (namely two lovely, kind women I work with who can rival Valentino with their sun damage AND don't seem to care) yet this is ALL I notice now or seem to think about. Not to mention my other problem with gum recession. I feel I have cut off a good 10 years from my performing career and will have to retire after next year.
I want to be that person that doesn't care and goes out and lives life. It takes me a while to get out the door as I'm so self conscious and the timing of going outdoors has to be carefully planned due to sun exposure. Crying every day, even at work, thoughts of suicide, wondering how I am going to make it through the rest of my life. And I really don't even have a terribly hard life except for sun damage and now, dental problems.
I know my HEAD is the problem. It's all in the way I THINK. EVERYONE gets old, I am no different. Thanks for indulging me here and for the past advice you have given me here. I know I need to see my PCP or a specialist about getting on some kind of hormone therapy but I'm so freakin' busy with the rest of my life and the inertia and depression I have to overcome to accomplish things gets in the way.
PLAN: Accept. Accept. Accept. Have a peel in the fall and see how that works.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/8/2009 Posts: 926 Points: 3,784
|
Refissa is just tretinoin in an emollient base. It's good. Use it as often as you can stand it, when you run out, get a refil, this is something to use for the rest of your life. Put it on your neck and hands, too. Also get some of this: http://www.lotioncrafter.com/lactic-acid-88.htmlPour two teaspoons of it into another bottle. Add eight teaspoons of water. Shake it up well. Wash your face, arms, neck, hands, legs. Apply the solution with a cotton ball or pad. Leave it on for 3 minutes, then rinse off. Some people use a neutralizer (just a little bit of baking soda in water) but at this strength it's not really necessary. Repeat every ten days. When you finish the 10 tsp of solution, up the concentration to 2 tsp 88% glycolic, 7 tsp water. I would not go over 40%. some details are here http://www.acne.org/messageboard/Glycolic-Lactic-Acid-Peel-t101901.htmlAfter you've done several of these superficial peels, at some point you may wish to go for a real peel, you could ask for TCA at your derm but it's painful and expensive with two week downtime but of course more dramatic results. I think the going rate is around $800 these days. From what you describe you may need several of them. But they will be much more effective than something superficial and in my opinion the best alternative to devices. From the time of your first post you could have done 4 home peels and seen some progress already. You can also get peel kits from Make Up Art Cosmetics but they are very expensive compared to the raw material prices. For $3.25 plus shipping you can hardly spend less. It's like having lunch at taco bell or something. Also you ought to be slathering your entire exposed parts with a very high quality high PPD European sunscreen. If you don't want to spend too much then for your arms, legs, and chest, use one of the newer SPF 70+ Neutrogenas, they have a photostable UVA formulation and their PPD is at least 14.
|
|
Rank: Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/7/2009 Posts: 279 Points: 837 Location: MA
|
Thanks kosmeds...
I've been using Retin A micro for almost two years (I think). It has helped my face a bit. It put it on my neck as well but I have bad sun damage on the sides of my neck that I have been told by two derms is very difficult to treat. I will try refissa perhaps when the Retin A runs out...
I'm afraid to do a peel myself. Thanks for your suggestion though, I will look into it. I think I'll just continue the Retin A until the fall when I have a peel. I think I'll start off with milder peels and then go from there. I'm going to also use the Retin A sparingly on my chest, it tends to cause sores to break out there.
Oh yeah, I wear copious amounts of sunscreen WHEN I go outside. Currently I use Neutrogena Dry Touch 85 SPF. Although yesterday I forgot my hat and was outside for about 15 minutes at peak hours doing errands - I had the Anthelios sample that I got at CVS on my face and neck but I still was bumming I forgot my hat. I ALWAYS wear a long sleeved UPF shirt when in the car and try to cover my hands as much as possible when driving.
Can applying lemon juice do anything??? Was thinking I could make compresses of it and place on my back for 20 minutes a day, meditate and imagine those freckles and brown areas just melting away. :-)
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/8/2009 Posts: 926 Points: 3,784
|
Lemon juice might be a mild bleach. The citric acid content is low, no more than 6% and at around pH 2.3. You'll get a lot more action from a 20% solution at that pH or unbuffered (even lower pH). Citric acid is a fine substitute for lactic or glycolic, but because its molecular weight is much higher (192 Da vs. 90 for lactic and 76 for glycolic) it won't penetrate as well or be as 'strong' at the same strength (concentration AND pH) as the other two. You can get that very cheap from lotioncrafter, too, and it's going to be cheaper than lemons.
Don't be afraid of these mild alpha hydroxy acids. They really ought not to be called peels because they are in no way nearly as effective or destructive as TCA. It's just going to be this irritating thing that makes your skin red, burn and itch a bit, shed, and push up new cells more quickly. Think of it as an exfoliation accelerator.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/12/2008 Posts: 1,232 Points: 3,671
|
rm1961 wrote:Thanks kosmeds...
Can applying lemon juice do anything??? Was thinking I could make compresses of it and place on my back for 20 minutes a day, meditate and imagine those freckles and brown areas just melting away. :-) I have been cutting a fresh lemon in half and rubbing the freshly cut sides to my facial pigmentation - and I feel it is working - the whole face is "brigher" - Also I did find some improvement with Cliniques "Even Better" serum - Also Azelex (20%) works but only as well as 2% hydroquinone - however it does not irritate the skin or make you sun sensitive - as Hydro is likely to do - Hotels in Cleveland
|
|
Rank: Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/7/2009 Posts: 279 Points: 837 Location: MA
|
I bought some Avon new Alternative Clearly C 10% Vitamin C on Ebay. I've been putting on my chest at night as it doesn't tolerate the retinoids much. Not sure if it will have much effect.
I will try to be brave and try the home peels you suggest, kosmeds. Just afraid that somehow I will screw up and make it worse. I need peels all over my body unfortunately.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/8/2009 Posts: 926 Points: 3,784
|
You're going to have to tolerate some irritation. Without it, there's no improvement. If you don't have the nerve to do it yourself, let the derm do it. He or she will be able to give you painkillers, prophylactic antibiotics, deeper correction, and an even application.
Some people still need IPL to correct for a seemingly permanent ruddiness. But I'd try peels for a few years first.
Try a test patch first. Some people do have very bad reactions but some people confuse a normal response with a very bad reaction. They call it acid for a reason!
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Editor
, Member
Joined: 5/15/2008 Posts: 3,012 Points: 9,765 Location: NYC
|
kosmeds- What's your opinion on the Jessner's peel? I want to get a stronger peel this fall I think. I usually do the 50% glycolic peels. I do a series of 6, 1 week apart about twice a year. What would be a good next step as far as peels go?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/8/2009 Posts: 926 Points: 3,784
|
I'd be more inclined to step up to 70% glycolic rather than a Jessner's solution. Jessner's is more indicated for acne or post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation than for mild to moderate photoaging. this compared the two for acne: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10417580It's also been compared to glycolic for melasma and found to be slightly less effective. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9092746But these are still in the very superficial category. If you want a more definitive step up try 15-20% TCA with a prepeel, any one of Jessner's, glycolic, CO2 dry ice, or salicylic, whichever your derm prefers. There might be an advantage to going with Jessner's or salicylic as a pre-peel if you are on the oily side due to solubility.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Editor
, Member
Joined: 5/15/2008 Posts: 3,012 Points: 9,765 Location: NYC
|
kosmeds wrote:I'd be more inclined to step up to 70% glycolic rather than a Jessner's solution. Jessner's is more indicated for acne or post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation than for mild to moderate photoaging. this compared the two for acne: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10417580It's also been compared to glycolic for melasma and found to be slightly less effective. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9092746But these are still in the very superficial category. If you want a more definitive step up try 15-20% TCA with a prepeel, any one of Jessner's, glycolic, CO2 dry ice, or salicylic, whichever your derm prefers. There might be an advantage to going with Jessner's or salicylic as a pre-peel if you are on the oily side due to solubility. Ok thanks, I'm going to ask my PS if he thinks I'm ready for a TCA. Can you do a TCA to the undereyes only?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/8/2009 Posts: 926 Points: 3,784
|
Ryan wrote:Ok thanks, I'm going to ask my PS if he thinks I'm ready for a TCA. Can you do a TCA to the undereyes only? Sure. You'll probably heal from that pretty quickly since the area is small. But he might not think you need it.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 9/18/2008 Posts: 7,082 Points: 17,072
|
Jessners is often used in conjunction with TCA for severe acne scarring in the correctly chosen patient. I had a TCA to the face, chest and neck last December with the dry ice before. EFFING OUCH. For me, as much as I LOVE my derm, it only helped with skin tone and did little for the acne scarring this time. Maybe the TCA he did in the early 90s improved my acne scars as much as they could be improved. The TCA did help with the sun damage on my chest. As for the neck, I haven't seen much change. I had posted pics during the process, beginning day one but I don't think I left them up. The down time was exactly 7 days and then back to normal. My derm is well-known in the field of peels, having pioneered the use of dry ice with TCA and other mediums. I went to one of the very best and I don't think I would do another medium peel. I think doing the lighter peels, as KM suggested in the beginning of this thread, is about all I would want to do again. The dry ice method was brutal for me...chest was the hardest part.
DCNGA has left the board and is no longer taking PMs. She requests that if you wish to e-mail her to use her direct e-mail address which is: laserandiplsupport@gmail.com
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/8/2009 Posts: 926 Points: 3,784
|
DCNGA wrote:I had a TCA to the face, chest and neck last December with the dry ice before. EFFING OUCH. Yes, medium-depth peels are very painful. it only helped with skin tone and did little for the acne scarring this time. Maybe the TCA he did in the early 90s improved my acne scars as much as they could be improved.Dented scars are almost impossible. Some people have had luck with TCA cross. Some people have had luck with aggressive use of a dermaroller with tretinoin, tazarotene, and vitamin C. I'd keep on using a dermaroller, it's the least risky thing to do, and it might make for some improvement over years of use. If the scar is in the lower dermis, there is not much you can do. The other thing to do is to fill them in with juvederm or restylane. I don't think I'd use Sculptra for this but a local derm in my town wrote a paper on it. He didn't get complete resolution but improvement. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2696608/I think his cases needed a restylane top-off. It's probably impossible to get the precisely needed amount with Sculptra alone.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 9/18/2008 Posts: 7,082 Points: 17,072
|
The during pain this time was FIVE times worse. Dry ice (a chunk) is smeared all over the face, pre-TCA. It's fast but OMFG, it hurt. Last time he sprayed something on me (in the early 90's) and even though the swelling that time was worse, the results was much better. I had a tremendous improvement in the acne scars from my first peel back then. My acne scars seemed to have worsened after my FL 3.5 years ago. I was thinking it would do just the opposite. Then I thought I would get as good a results this time as I did the first with a peel. Not so much. Ugh. Oh well, just be aware that medium peels are not for the feint of heart.
DCNGA has left the board and is no longer taking PMs. She requests that if you wish to e-mail her to use her direct e-mail address which is: laserandiplsupport@gmail.com
|
|
|
Guest |