NEW! Visit Miss J's Store.

Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In

LipoDissolve and FDA Warning Options · View
DCNGA
Posted: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 4:22:30 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/18/2008
Posts: 7,082
Points: 17,072
Beware:

http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm207453.htm

DCNGA has left the board and is no longer taking PMs.
She requests that if you wish to e-mail her to use her direct e-mail address which is: laserandiplsupport@gmail.com
MissJ
Posted: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 4:49:44 PM
Rank: Administration
Groups: Administration

Joined: 5/14/2008
Posts: 17,648
Points: 45,029
Of what--the FDA or Lipo Dissolve?

All lipodissolve is is basically lecithin; something that has the capacity to emulsify fat. It's approved as a natural fat emulsifier although in foods. So, the FDA has not approved it to inject into human fat deposits. It does work though. However the problem with it is that for large scale injections, the result can be LUMPY simply because it's too time consuming to inject many punctures close together along a broad surface area.

Can hardly walk. Need hip replacement.
MissJ
Posted: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 5:07:16 PM
Rank: Administration
Groups: Administration

Joined: 5/14/2008
Posts: 17,648
Points: 45,029
"The FDA is not aware of any credible scientific evidence that supports the effectiveness of any of these substances for fat elimination, and their safety when used alone or in combination is unknown."

Firstly the FDA classifies the substances as "DRUGS". Folks, this lipo-dissolve stuff is basically lecithin and/or the compounds found in lecithin. Then the FDA says they are not aware of any credible scientific evidence that supports the use of this stuff for fat elimination. Looks like the FDA should be reminded that lecithin is a known and known safe product used for FAT EMULSIFICATION. Not too much of an extrapolation that it would probably work if injected into human fat. Lot's of empirical observations that it does.

However, the FDA is in the capacity to bag docs promoting it for such which clearly it's doing here. However, just because the FDA is bagging them, I have no reason to conclude the lipodissolve stuff is "dangerous" given that is just basically lecithin. For all I know, some big corporate pharmaceutical interest might have plans on using the same stuff to do similar and wants to stop independent doctors from using the same modality.

Can hardly walk. Need hip replacement.
DCNGA
Posted: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 5:17:10 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/18/2008
Posts: 7,082
Points: 17,072
MissJ wrote:
Of what--the FDA or Lipo Dissolve?

All lipodissolve is is basically lecithin; something that has the capacity to emulsify fat. It's approved as a natural fat emulsifier although in foods. So, the FDA has not approved it to inject into human fat deposits. It does work though. However the problem with it is that for large scale injections, the result can be LUMPY simply because it's too time consuming to inject many punctures close together along a broad surface area.


Either and both.

I know someone who had Lipodissolve. It left her a lumpy mess. Left uneven places, dips, and valleys. She will never look the same. She also was in excruciating pain during/after the procedure.

I am by no means a fan of the FDA--quite the contrary but it's still good to know these things.

They are also taking exception to the claims made by seven specific doctors/spas:

Quote:
Each of the companies involved has been cited for a variety of regulatory violations, including making unsupported claims that the products have an outstanding safety record and are superior to other fat loss procedures, including liposuction. Additionally some of the letters indicate that the companies have made claims that lipodissolve products can be used to treat certain medical conditions, such as male breast enlargement, benign fatty growths known as lipomas, excess fat deposits and surgical deformities. The FDA is not aware of clinical evidence to support any of these claims.

The FDA has received reports of adverse effects in persons who have had the procedure using these drugs, including permanent scarring, skin deformation, and deep painful knots under the skin in areas where the lipodissolve products have been injected.

The warning letters were issued to the following U.S. companies: Monarch Medspa, King of Prussia, Pa; Spa 35, Boise, Idaho; Medical Cosmetic Enhancements, Chevy Chase, Md.; Innovative Directions in Health, Edina, Minn.; PURE Med Spa, Boca Raton, Fl.; and All About You Med Spa, Madison, Ind. The Brazilian company receiving a warning letter markets lipodissolve products on two Web sites: zipmed.net and mesoone.com.





DCNGA has left the board and is no longer taking PMs.
She requests that if you wish to e-mail her to use her direct e-mail address which is: laserandiplsupport@gmail.com
DCNGA
Posted: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 5:28:51 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/18/2008
Posts: 7,082
Points: 17,072
Here's a link to the letter they sent to Pure Med Spa:

http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/ucm207642.htm

Quote:
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002


WARNING LETTER


April 6, 2010


VIA FEDEX



Mr. Jeff Nourse
www.puremedspa.com
301 Yamato Road
Boca Raton, FL 33431


Dear Mr. Nourse:


The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reviewed your website, www.puremedspa.com. As explained below, your website contains false or misleading claims related to your LipoDissolve products, causing them to be misbranded in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), 21 U.S.C. §§ 352(a), 352(n), and 321(n), and FDA’s implementing regulations. See 21 CFR 202.1(e)(5)(i) and (e)(6)(i).


Your LipoDissolve products are intended to cure, treat, mitigate, or prevent disease in humans or to affect the structure or function of the body. Statements on your websites that document these intended uses include, but are not limited to, the following:


• “The medications used in the LipoDissolve causes [sic] lysis of the fat cell wall. This allows the fat that is being stored in the cell to be released, and is taken by the lymphatic system to the liver where it is metabolized and excreted in the urine.”


• “The main ingredient is Phosphatidylcholine, which is actually what causes the fat cell to break down.”


• “LipoDissolve can also aid in the treatment of various medical conditions in both men and women. This includes fat deposits on the face and body, cellulite, lipomas, help with skin retraction, and more.”


Because these LipoDissolve products are intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in humans, or to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals, they are drugs, as defined by section 201(g)(1) of the FDCA [21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)]. In addition, your firm’s injectable Lipodissolve products are prescription drugs, as defined in section 503(b)(1) of the FDCA [21 U.S.C. § 353(b)(1)], because the method of their use is not safe for use except under the supervision of a practitioner licensed by law to administer such drugs. Under sections 502(a) and 502(n) of the FDCA and FDA’s implementing regulations, a drug is misbranded if its labeling or advertising is false or misleading. Section 201(n) of the FDCA [21 U.S.C. § 321(n)] provides that, in determining whether a drug's labeling or advertising "is misleading, there shall be taken into account . . . not only representations made or suggested . . . but also the extent to which the labeling or advertising . . . fails to reveal facts material in light of such representations . . . . " Advertisements that contain a representation or suggestion that a drug is better, more effective, or safer than has been demonstrated by substantial evidence or substantial clinical experience are false or misleading.


Pure Med Spa’s website contains unsubstantiated efficacy and safety claims concerning LipoDissolve products for the following reasons:


1. Unsubstantiated Efficacy Claims


Your website contains unsubstantiated efficacy claims concerning LipoDissolve products, including:


• “Its [sic] not a question of whether Lipodissolve will work, but rather how many treatments it will take to attain a goal in reduction.”


• “Generally, the average patient requires approximately 2-4 treatments with the goal of losing AT LEAST 1 inch of fat with each treatment.”


• “The results from Lipodissolve will last permanently in the area treated.”


FDA regards these claims as false or misleading. FDA is not aware of evidence that supports these claims.


2. Unsubstantiated Safety Claims


Your website contains unsubstantiated safety claims concerning LipoDissolve products, including:


• “The main ingredient used to cause the fat cells to break down is not a synthetic medication, but rather a natural homeopathic ingredient, which has been used intravenously in Europe over 30 years to treat plaques in blood vessels with extensive research showing safety. In Lipodissolve, this same medication is just being used for a new purpose.”


These claims imply that these products have been proven safe. Although intravenous phosphatidylcholine has been approved in some countries for the treatment of a variety of conditions, it has not been approved in the U.S. FDA is unaware of evidence to support the safety claims for your LipoDissolve products.


As explained above, the claims made for your LipoDissolve products are false or misleading in that they are not supported by substantial evidence or substantial clinical experience. These claims cause your LipoDissolve products to be misbranded under the FDCA [21 U.S.C. §§ 352(a), 352(n), and 321(n)].


Conclusion


The issues and violations cited in this letter are not intended to be an all-inclusive statement of violations that exist at your facility. You are responsible for investigating and determining the causes of the violations identified above and for preventing their recurrence or the occurrence of other violations. It is your responsibility to assure that your firm complies with all requirements of federal law and FDA regulations.


You should take prompt action to correct the violations cited in this letter. Failure to promptly correct these violations may result in legal action without further notice, including, without limitation, seizure and injunction. Other federal agencies may take this Warning Letter into account when considering the award of contracts.


Within fifteen working days of receipt of this letter, please notify this office in writing of the specific steps that you have taken to correct violations. Include an explanation of each step being taken to prevent the recurrence of violations, as well as copies of related documentation. If you cannot complete corrective action within fifteen working days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which you will complete the correction.


Your written response should be addressed to:


Sudha Shukla, PharmD
Consumer Safety Officer
FDA/CDER/Office of Compliance
10903 New Hampshire Avenue, WO51-5238
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002


Sincerely,

/Michael M. Levy, Jr./
Michael M. Levy, Jr., Esq.
Director
Division of New Drugs and Labeling Compliance
Office of Compliance
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research


-

DCNGA has left the board and is no longer taking PMs.
She requests that if you wish to e-mail her to use her direct e-mail address which is: laserandiplsupport@gmail.com
MissJ
Posted: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 5:30:24 PM
Rank: Administration
Groups: Administration

Joined: 5/14/2008
Posts: 17,648
Points: 45,029
Well, as I said, the stuff (and injector) can leave a lumpy mess simply because it's hard to inject the thousands of areas that would have to be spaced close together on a wide surface (like a thigh). But the fact that it leaves a lumpy mess tells you that where injected, the stuff dissolved some fat. The lumps would be from the undissolved fat that were not hit by the injection.

Ya, I can see them taking exception with the particular doctors hyping up the claims. It's unfortunate though that now doctors who use it responsibly (but don't make the outlandish claims ) might be precluded from using it at all.

Can hardly walk. Need hip replacement.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.7 (NET v2.0) - 11/20/2007
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.
This page was generated in 0.153 seconds.